Keyword summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video889 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizens Research Council results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 2,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (19,667 of 33,961 keywords). This Citizens Research Council is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Citizens Research Council
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Radio Broadcasts1%
⁠0%Metropolitan Opera1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠43%Citizens Research Council (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,667
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Citizens Research Council attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Citizens Research Council vs sitewide
Citizens Research Council attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos