Keyword summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video1,650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese Exclusion Act results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 940 hits. Analysis detected 4,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,090 of 28,613 keywords). This Chinese Exclusion Act is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Chinese Exclusion Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠37%Chinese Exclusion Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,950
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chinese Exclusion Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chinese Exclusion Act vs sitewide
Chinese Exclusion Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos