Keyword summary
0%15 analyzed articles/videos1,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Japan Relations results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 2,383 hits. Analysis detected 16,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,913 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (14,056 of 28,615 keywords). This China Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
China Japan Relations
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
China Japan Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
China Japan Relations vs sitewide
China Japan Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.