Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Children's Online Privacy Protection Act results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Bandwagon, and Availability Heuristic, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,333 of 37,536 keywords). This Children's Online Privacy Protection Act is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,212
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act vs sitewide
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos