Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Bears results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 824 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (15,219 of 28,625 keywords). This Chicago Bears is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Chicago Bears
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chicago Bears attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chicago Bears vs sitewide
Chicago Bears attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.