Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chewing results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 855 hits. Analysis detected 3,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,871 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,179 of 28,615 keywords). This Chewing is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Chewing
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chewing attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chewing vs sitewide
Chewing attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.