Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Center For International Trade And Economics results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Slippery Slope, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,027 hits. Analysis detected 6,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 29,961 keywords). This Center For International Trade And Economics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Center For International Trade And Economics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Center For International Trade And Economics (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,736
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Center For International Trade And Economics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Center For International Trade And Economics vs sitewide
Center For International Trade And Economics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos