Keyword summary
65%1 analyzed article/video746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center For Constitutional Rights results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 3,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 79% (5,528 of 26,357 keywords). This Center For Constitutional Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Center For Constitutional Rights
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Center For Constitutional Rights attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Center For Constitutional Rights vs sitewide
Center For Constitutional Rights attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.