BS Summary: These Center For Community Uplift results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 938 hits. Analysis detected 8,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (17,381 of 23,302 keywords). This Center For Community Uplift is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Center For Community Uplift
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wholegrains0%
⁠0%Weed0%
⁠0%Wang Wen0%
⁠0%Vegetation Fire0%
⁠0%U S House0%
⁠26%Center For Community Uplift (selected)3%
⁠100%Reuven Carlyle60%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,808
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Center For Community Uplift attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Center For Community Uplift vs All Other Publications
Center For Community Uplift attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.