Keyword summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cancer Research Funding results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 733 hits. Analysis detected 3,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,538 of 27,732 keywords). This Cancer Research Funding is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Cancer Research Funding
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠30%Cancer Research Funding (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,872
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cancer Research Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cancer Research Funding vs sitewide
Cancer Research Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos