Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Staffers results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 4,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (26,194 of 29,241 keywords). This Campaign Staffers is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Campaign Staffers
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Campaign Staffers attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Campaign Staffers vs sitewide
Campaign Staffers attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.