Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These California Assembly Bill 325 results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 235 hits. Analysis detected 1,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This California Assembly Bill 325 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
California Assembly Bill 325
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
California Assembly Bill 325 attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
California Assembly Bill 325 vs sitewide
California Assembly Bill 325 attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.