Keyword summary
â 0%1 analyzed article/video599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bipartisan Concern results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 2,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of â 60% (15,130 of 37,338 keywords). This Bipartisan Concern is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Bipartisan Concern
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Bipartisan Concern attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Bipartisan Concern vs sitewide
Bipartisan Concern attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.