Keyword summary
80%1 analyzed article/video327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assassination Threats Judges results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 1,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,552 of 26,830 keywords). This Assassination Threats Judges is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Assassination Threats Judges
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Assassination Threats Judges attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Assassination Threats Judges vs sitewide
Assassination Threats Judges attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.