Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arizona V California results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,000 hits. Analysis detected 6,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (32,942 of 37,536 keywords). This Arizona V California is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Arizona V California
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠13%Arizona V California (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,064
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Arizona V California attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Arizona V California vs sitewide
Arizona V California attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos