Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Argumentum Ad Logicam results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Circular Reasoning, and Genetic Fallacy, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 677 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,242 of 28,615 keywords). This Argumentum Ad Logicam is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Argumentum Ad Logicam
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠33%Argumentum Ad Logicam (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Argumentum Ad Logicam attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Argumentum Ad Logicam vs sitewide
Argumentum Ad Logicam attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Argument from fallacy⁠9%
Wikipedia⁠0%1/9/2026, 8:48:55 AM