Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Appropriations Committee results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 719 hits. Analysis detected 4,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,567 of 37,536 keywords). This Appropriations Committee is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Appropriations Committee
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Appropriations Committee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Appropriations Committee vs sitewide
Appropriations Committee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.