Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apollo Program results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 428 hits. Analysis detected 2,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (23,550 of 29,241 keywords). This Apollo Program is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Apollo Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠20%Apollo Program (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,836
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Apollo Program attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Apollo Program vs sitewide
Apollo Program attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos