Keyword summary
92%1 analyzed article/video1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anticorruption Agencies results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 4,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,375 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (12,772 of 36,500 keywords). This Anticorruption Agencies is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Anticorruption Agencies
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Anticorruption Agencies attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Anticorruption Agencies vs sitewide
Anticorruption Agencies attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.