Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ambitions results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 2,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,782 of 37,536 keywords). This Ambitions is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Ambitions
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ambitions attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ambitions vs sitewide
Ambitions attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.