Keyword summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Al Mezan Center For Human Rights results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 579 hits. Analysis detected 4,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (11,794 of 27,005 keywords). This Al Mezan Center For Human Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Al Mezan Center For Human Rights
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠57%Al Mezan Center For Human Rights (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Al Mezan Center For Human Rights attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Al Mezan Center For Human Rights vs sitewide
Al Mezan Center For Human Rights attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos