Author summary
75%1 analyzed article/video1,617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zena Tahhan results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 759 hits. Analysis detected 5,610 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,468 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,969 of 8,882 authors). This Zena Tahhan is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Zena Tahhan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
67%Zena Tahhan (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,468
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos