Author summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video1,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zara Stone results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 3,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,087 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (2,551 of 6,580 authors). This Zara Stone is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Zara Stone
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠62%Zara Stone (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,087
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Zara Stone attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Zara Stone vs sitewide
Zara Stone attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos