Author summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WNYC Staff results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 423 hits. Analysis detected 1,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,350 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (744 of 5,497 authors). This WNYC Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
WNYC Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠87%WNYC Staff (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,350
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
WNYC Staff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
WNYC Staff vs sitewide
WNYC Staff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos