Author summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video1,483 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William C. Anderson results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,055 hits. Analysis detected 6,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (2,669 of 8,292 authors). This William C. Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
William C. Anderson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠68%William C. Anderson (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,932
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
William C. Anderson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
William C. Anderson vs sitewide
William C. Anderson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos