Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Will Walkey results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,244 authors). This Will Walkey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Will Walkey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Will Walkey (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 332
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles332 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 4.8%4.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos