Author summary
45%1 analyzed article/video620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Blade results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 2,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,660 of 9,487 authors). This Washington Blade is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Washington Blade
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
83%Washington Blade (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,480
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos