Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Walid Phares results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 3,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Walid Phares is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Walid Phares
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Walid Phares (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,616
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Walid Phares attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Walid Phares vs sitewide
Walid Phares attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos