Author summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Copeland results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 3,375 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,127 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (867 of 6,070 authors). This Victoria Copeland is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Victoria Copeland
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠86%Victoria Copeland (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,127
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Victoria Copeland attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Victoria Copeland vs sitewide
Victoria Copeland attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos