Author summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video1,250 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vani Sanganeria results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,750 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (2,820 of 6,023 authors). This Vani Sanganeria is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Vani Sanganeria
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠54%Vani Sanganeria (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,750
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Vani Sanganeria attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Vani Sanganeria vs sitewide
Vani Sanganeria attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos