Author summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ty Pendlebury results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Genetic Fallacy, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 455 faulty-reasoning hits from 756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (1,844 of 5,819 authors). This Ty Pendlebury is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Ty Pendlebury
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠69%Ty Pendlebury (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 756
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ty Pendlebury attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ty Pendlebury vs sitewide
Ty Pendlebury attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos