Author summary
⁠13%2 analyzed articles/videos2,419 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Marshall Project results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,897 hits. Analysis detected 5,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,786 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (6,722 of 6,779 authors). This The Marshall Project is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
The Marshall Project
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠1%The Marshall Project (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,786
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
The Marshall Project attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
The Marshall Project vs sitewide
The Marshall Project attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos