Author summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tess Martinelli results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 2,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (4,446 of 8,323 authors). This Tess Martinelli is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Tess Martinelli
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠47%Tess Martinelli (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,636
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tess Martinelli attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tess Martinelli vs sitewide
Tess Martinelli attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos