Author summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Hennessey results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 555 hits. Analysis detected 2,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,314 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (2,263 of 5,133 authors). This Ted Hennessey is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Ted Hennessey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠56%Ted Hennessey (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,314
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ted Hennessey attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ted Hennessey vs sitewide
Ted Hennessey attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos