Author summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tamara Nyberg results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 716 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,890 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (1,181 of 4,797 authors). This Tamara Nyberg is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Tamara Nyberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠0%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠1%Jason Karaian1%
⁠76%Tamara Nyberg (selected)5%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,890
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tamara Nyberg attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tamara Nyberg vs All Other Publications
Tamara Nyberg attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos