Author summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Schuck results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 612 hits . Analysis detected 4,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 88% (1,213 of 9,471 authors). This Steve Schuck is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Steve Schuck
Author details
Total words: 2,808
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.2% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 21.4% 21.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.6% 21.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.6%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 21.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst