Author summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video2,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen M. Walt results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 966 hits. Analysis detected 3,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (2,305 of 4,915 authors). This Stephen M. Walt is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Stephen M. Walt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠54%Stephen M. Walt (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stephen M. Walt attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stephen M. Walt vs sitewide
Stephen M. Walt attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos