Author summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Busemeyer results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 2,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (2,277 of 8,244 authors). This Stephen Busemeyer is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Stephen Busemeyer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠73%Stephen Busemeyer (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,428
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stephen Busemeyer attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stephen Busemeyer vs sitewide
Stephen Busemeyer attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos