Author summary
17%1 analyzed article/video831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stefan Becket results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 1,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,365 of 9,471 authors). This Stefan Becket is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Stefan Becket
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
33%Stefan Becket (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 11.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.6%Middle Ground: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos