Author summary
95%1 analyzed article/video1,399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special to El Paso Matters results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 4,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,197 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,651 of 5,400 authors). This Special to El Paso Matters is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Special to El Paso Matters
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Special to El Paso Matters attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Special to El Paso Matters vs sitewide
Special to El Paso Matters attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.