Author summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharon Galasso results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 460 hits. Analysis detected 2,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (2,684 of 6,744 authors). This Sharon Galasso is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Sharon Galasso
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠61%Sharon Galasso (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sharon Galasso attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sharon Galasso vs sitewide
Sharon Galasso attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos