Author summary
39%1 analyzed article/video75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharon Bernstein results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 259 faulty-reasoning hits from 300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.4% and a BS Rank of 98% (182 of 8,641 authors). This Sharon Bernstein is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
Sharon Bernstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
98%Sharon Bernstein (selected)15%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 300
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510097.9% percentile
14.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles300 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 34.7%34.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 9.7%9.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 34.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 11.3%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos