Author summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shannon Pineau results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 303 hits . Analysis detected 1,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,190 of 9,303 authors). This Shannon Pineau is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Shannon Pineau
Author details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 11.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst