Author summary
83%1 analyzed article/video231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seth M. Siegel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 936 faulty-reasoning hits from 924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,505 of 8,897 authors). This Seth M. Siegel is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Seth M. Siegel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
84%Seth M. Siegel (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 924
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510083.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles924 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 13.4%13.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.6%5.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 13.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos