Author summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 1,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Wild results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 683 hits . Analysis detected 2,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,403 of 9,481 authors). This Sarah Wild is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Sarah Wild
Author details
Total words: 5,768
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst