Author summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Matthews results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 77.4% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 888 faulty-reasoning hits from 252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (18 of 8,366 authors). This Sarah Matthews is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Sarah Matthews
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Sarah Matthews (selected)30%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 252
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sarah Matthews attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sarah Matthews vs sitewide
Sarah Matthews attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos