Author summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah K. Burris results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (1,242 of 6,379 authors). This Sarah K. Burris is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Sarah K. Burris
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠81%Sarah K. Burris (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,647
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sarah K. Burris attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sarah K. Burris vs sitewide
Sarah K. Burris attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos