Author summary
ā 49%1 analyzed article/video594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Harwell results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ā 57% (2,921 of 6,798 authors). This Sarah Harwell is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Sarah Harwell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Cleveland Documenters1%
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Sneha Dey1%
ā 1%Ideastream Public Media1%
ā 57%Sarah Harwell (selected)3%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sarah Harwell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sarah Harwell vs sitewide
Sarah Harwell attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos