Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 1,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Betancourt results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 831 hits . Analysis detected 3,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,449 of 9,471 authors). This Sarah Betancourt is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Sarah Betancourt
Author details
Total words: 7,516
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst