Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sarah Agostino results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Recency Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 137 hits . Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,531 authors). This Sarah Agostino is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sarah Agostino
Author details
Total words: 2,152
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst